Guatemala’s Aug. 20 presidential election has been bogged down in court and legal challenges despite the fact the results were clear: Progressive candidate Bernardo Arévalo won about 61% of the vote to conservative Sandra Torres’ 39%. After weeks of uncertainty, the top electoral court finally certified Arévalo as the winner Monday.
But federal prosecutors are seeking to suspend his party, throwing into doubt whether he will have any support in congress. And Torres has filed court challenges seeking to overturn the election result, alleging fraud in the vote count — something none of the independent election observer groups reported.
How did it get so complicated?
Governmental corruption and impunity was so bad in Guatemala that in 2006 the country had to call in a United Nations-backed commission, known as CICIG, to combat it.
The commission’s work led to some serious results: In 2015, Guatemala became one of the few countries in the world to force a sitting president, Otto Pérez Molina, to resign and immediately go to jail, along with his vice president.
The next elected president, Jimmy Morales — and much of Guatemala’s political elite — decided things had gone too far. Morales kicked out CICIG in 2019.
Punta Mita Residents Protest Damage to Turtle Nesting Site
Tragedy and Farce in the Story of ‘El Chapo’ Guzmán
History Made: Sebastian Sawe Runs First Official Sub-2 Marathon at London Marathon
IMMIGRATION
Renee Good’s Killer Remains on Duty While FBI Probe Stalls
BUSINESS
High Gas Prices Push EV Interest in Los Angeles, but Latino Buyers Still Face Hurdles to Ownership
California Pauses Venture Capital Diversity Law, Leaving Latina Founders Waiting
Self-Employed vs Business Owner: Owning a Job or Building Wealth
Women Leaders Are Driving AI Strategy. But Latina Talent Risks Being Left Behind