New federal housing directives aim to expand supply and mortgage access while limiting investor purchases—moves that could reshape affordability for Latino families and first-time buyers.
A series of new federal housing directives signed by Donald Trump aims to expand homeownership by reducing construction regulations and widening mortgage access, a policy shift that could affect housing supply and affordability across the United States—including California’s heavily constrained housing market.
The orders, announced by the The White House in early 2026, focus on three core strategies: easing regulatory barriers to construction, expanding mortgage access through community banks, and limiting large institutional investors from acquiring single-family homes.
Federal officials say the changes are intended to boost housing supply and lower costs, a central challenge as home prices remain historically high.
According to housing data from the National Association of Realtors, the United States currently faces a shortage of roughly 4 to 5 million homes, a supply gap that has pushed homeownership further out of reach for many working families.
Expanding Mortgage Access
One executive order directs regulators—including the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau—to tailor mortgage rules so that community banks and smaller lenders can expand lending, particularly for manufactured and factory-built housing.
Federal housing agencies, including Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, have also been instructed to support liquidity in mortgage markets. In earlier policy actions between 2025 and 2026, the government directed the enterprises to purchase about $200 billion in mortgage-backed securities in an effort to stabilize borrowing costs.
Housing economists say manufactured and modular homes could become an increasingly important solution.
The Urban Institute notes that factory-built housing can cost 30% to 50% less than traditional construction, offering a faster path to expanding supply.
Restricting Institutional Investors
Another order targets large institutional investors, including private equity firms that have purchased significant shares of single-family homes in recent years.
The directive instructs federal agencies to limit policies that enable bulk acquisitions of homes by Wall Street-backed investment firms—an issue that has drawn bipartisan concern among policymakers.
Research from the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta has found that in some metropolitan areas institutional investors purchased over 20% of single-family homes during peak buying periods, intensifying competition for first-time buyers.
California: Policy Collision
The federal actions may have significant implications for California, where housing shortages are among the most severe in the country.
While federal orders emphasize deregulation, California has pursued its own housing reforms, including legislation aimed at speeding up housing development near transit and reducing local zoning barriers.
Recent laws such as SB 35 and SB 79 seek to accelerate housing approvals and increase density near major transit corridors.
However, tensions remain between federal efforts to streamline environmental reviews and California’s strict environmental standards overseen by the California Air Resources Board.
For Latino communities—who represent a growing share of first-time homebuyers nationally, according to the National Association of Hispanic Real Estate Professionals—the outcome of these policies could play a major role in determining whether homeownership becomes more attainable in the coming decade.
With federal and state housing strategies now moving in parallel—and sometimes in conflict—the direction of housing affordability in states like California may hinge on how these competing policies ultimately unfold.
What Trump’s Housing Executive Order Really Means for Latino Neighborhoods in Los Angeles
