Experts explain why startup financing decisions between equity vs debt can determine control, risk, and long-term survival
For decades, entrepreneurs have faced the same fundamental question: Is raising capital the best way to launch and grow a company, or is financing through banks and debt a smarter path?
The answer is not as simple as choosing between equity and loans. It depends on timing, cash flow, risk, and — above all — the stage of the business.
While traditional small and medium-sized businesses have historically relied on debt, startups are often pushed toward equity. But experts say this divide is driven less by strategy than by structural constraints in the financial system.
Why debt is usually cheaper than capital
From a pure financial standpoint, debt is almost always cheaper than equity.
Renowned valuation expert Aswath Damodaran, professor of finance at New York University, has long argued that equity is the most expensive form of capital because investors assume the highest risk and therefore demand the highest returns. Unlike loans, equity has no fixed cost ceiling — dilution compounds over time.
Banking experts agree. Raising equity involves substantial transaction costs, including legal fees and due diligence processes that often range from $35,000 to over $100,000, paid by the company itself. In addition, founders give up ownership, control, and future upside.
“There is also a clear tax advantage to debt,” banking professionals note. Interest payments are tax-deductible, while dividends are not — a structural benefit that can significantly reduce a company’s effective cost of capital.
For these reasons, if a company can access financing, debt is usually the better option.
Why most startups still raise equity
Despite its cost, equity remains the default option for early-stage startups — not because founders prefer it, but because they often have no alternative.
Banks lend based on repayment capacity, not vision. Without predictable cash flows, most startups fail to meet basic lending criteria.
This reality has been highlighted repeatedly by Jamie Dimon, CEO of JPMorgan Chase, who has emphasized that debt only works when cash flow is visible and sustainable. For young companies burning capital while testing their business model, that condition rarely exists.
Venture capitalists echo this view. Marc Andreessen, co-founder of Andreessen Horowitz, has described startups as temporary organizations designed to search for a scalable business model. Until that model is proven, fixed repayment obligations can become dangerous.
In that context, equity acts as a form of risk-sharing. Investors absorb uncertainty in exchange for ownership, allowing founders time to iterate, pivot, and grow.
The strategic value of equity in early stages
Equity offers more than money — it can bring experience, networks, and strategic guidance, particularly for young or first-time founders.
Reid Hoffman, co-founder of LinkedIn, has frequently stressed that the right investors can accelerate learning, open doors, and help founders avoid costly mistakes. This alignment of interests is one of equity’s greatest strengths in high-risk environments.
However, that alignment comes at a price. Equity investors expect significantly higher returns than banks, and they often gain substantial control rights.
“When you bring in a partner, you lose autonomy,” experts warn. Investors may influence strategy, timelines, or risk appetite — sometimes in ways that conflict with the founder’s original vision.
That is why choosing the right partners matters more than the valuation itself.
The critical role of company stage
Financing decisions change as companies mature.
Early stage: flexibility over cost
In the earliest phases, flexibility and strategic value often outweigh cost optimization. Equity can be more expensive, but it provides breathing room when revenues are uncertain.
Still, founders are advised to avoid excessive fragmentation of the cap table and to conduct thorough due diligence on potential partners. Corporate law firms such as Wilson Sonsini and Cooley LLP, which represent thousands of startups globally, consistently warn that poorly negotiated shareholders’ agreements are among the most damaging long-term mistakes founders make.
Consolidation phase: combining equity and debt
Once a company reaches $300,000 to $500,000 in annual revenue, new options emerge.
At this stage, many founders combine equity from specialized investment funds with bank financing. Equity is often used to fund marketing, team expansion, and growth initiatives, while debt finances capital expenditures such as equipment, software, or infrastructure.
This hybrid approach allows companies to scale while limiting unnecessary dilution.
Growth phase: private debt takes center stage
For companies generating tens of millions in revenue, the conversation shifts again.
At this level, startups often seek funding for acquisitions, international expansion, or large-scale technology investments — without bringing in new equity partners.
This is where private debt comes into play. According to David Rubenstein, co-founder of The Carlyle Group, private credit has grown rapidly because it allows companies to raise substantial capital while preserving ownership — provided their fundamentals are strong.
Private debt typically complements bank loans and is reserved for mature startups with proven revenue and resilience. It rarely appears in early-stage ventures or even Series A companies.
Not all capital — or debt — is created equal
Within both equity and debt, quality matters.
On the equity side, founders are urged to negotiate shareholders’ agreements carefully. These documents govern control, exit rights, and decision-making long after funding is secured.
On the debt side, options range from traditional bank loans to public instruments such as bonds — though the latter are typically reserved for large corporations. When accessible, simpler forms of debt — bank financing, private loans, or public support programs — are often preferable.
Exploring mixed and alternative formulas
The market has also given rise to hybrid solutions.
Collective investment platforms and agile funds offer capital with operational speed and ongoing support. Convertible notes, for example, allow startups to receive funding quickly while deferring valuation until a later equity round.
These instruments are often used as bridges — providing liquidity without locking founders into premature terms.
No universal formula — only informed decisions
There is no single right way to finance a company.
As Warren Buffett has warned for decades, debt can amplify both success and failure. Used wisely, it preserves ownership and discipline. Used prematurely, it can suffocate a business.
Equity buys time, alignment, and support — but at a significant cost.
The most successful founders do not copy trends or follow rigid playbooks. They assess their stage, their cash flow, and the partners they are willing to bring into their journey.
In the end, financing is not just about money.
It is about control, resilience, and choosing the right tools at the right moment.
Top 5 Things Investors Want in Startups to Secure Funding in 2025
