The order claims to rein in Wall Street investors—but housing advocates say Latino renters and families facing displacement may see little immediate relief.
Yesterday, President Donald Trump signed an executive order aimed at curbing large institutional investors from buying up single-family homes—a practice widely blamed for driving up prices and accelerating displacement in working-class communities. The order arrives amid mounting frustration in neighborhoods like Boyle Heights, South Central, and West Adams, where rising rents and investor-driven redevelopment have pushed many Latino families to the brink.
But housing experts caution that the order is more directional than transformational.
The executive order does not ban Wall Street firms, private equity funds, or real estate investment trusts (REITs) from buying homes. Instead, it instructs federal agencies to adjust existing policies in ways that could limit investor advantages over individual buyers.
Specifically, the order:
• Directs the Justice Department and Federal Trade Commission to review large-scale housing acquisitions for potential anti-competitive behavior.
• Asks the Treasury Department to revise federal housing finance rules that may indirectly favor institutional buyers.
• Expands so-called “first-look” policies, which give individual buyers priority access to certain federally backed or foreclosed homes before investors can bid.
• Encourages greater transparency around corporate ownership of single-family housing.
In plain terms, the order signals that the federal government no longer wants to actively assist large investors in dominating housing markets—but it stops short of restricting private capital itself.
For Los Angeles’ Latino renters—the majority of households in many affected neighborhoods—the limits of the order are significant.
The policy does not:
• Cap rents or prevent rent hikes
• Stop corporate landlords from buying multifamily apartment buildings
• Reverse past acquisitions or restore lost affordable housing
• Override state or local zoning laws
• Guarantee tenant protections or right-to-return policies
According to the UCLA Luskin Institute on Inequality and Democracy, institutional landlords in Los Angeles overwhelmingly focus on multifamily properties, not single-family homes—the very sector the order largely leaves untouched.
Latino neighborhoods in Los Angeles have long been shaped by exclusionary policies—from redlining to underinvestment—making them prime targets once capital flows in. When Wall Street arrives, it often brings higher rents, commercial turnover, and cultural displacement rather than stability.
Housing advocates warn that without stronger enforcement mechanisms or congressional action, the executive order may offer political messaging more than immediate relief.
“The problem isn’t just who buys homes—it’s who gets protected after the sale,” one housing policy analyst told Parriva. “Without tenant safeguards, affordability measures, and local accountability, displacement continues.”
For now, the order marks a rhetorical shift. Whether it becomes a meaningful tool for affordability—or another missed opportunity—will depend on what follows next.
Homebuying Burden Explodes in California’s Cheapest Counties
