The new California e-bike law SB 1271 tightens throttle and speed rules, but widespread modifications raise safety concerns in urban communities
California’s new electric bike law took effect on January 1, 2026, it tightens safety standards across the state — from mandatory rear lights to stricter labeling and sales bans on non-compliant bikes. But for many riders, parents, and local officials, the biggest danger may remain largely untouched: how fast today’s e-bikes can really go once they leave the store.
Senate Bill 1271 (SB 1271), passed in 2024, is designed to bring order to a rapidly expanding e-bike market that now includes everything from commuter-friendly pedal-assist bikes to high-powered machines that can rival small motorcycles. The law clarifies e-bike classes, restricts throttles, and aims to curb unsafe equipment. Yet it stops short of addressing how easily many e-bikes can be modified to exceed legal speed limits — often with a few clicks, wires, or aftermarket parts.
What SB 1271 Changes — On Paper
Under the new rules, all e-bikes sold or operated in California must meet stricter safety and compliance standards:
-
Mandatory rear visibility: Every e-bike must have a red rear reflector or light — solid or flashing — visible from at least 500 feet, day or night. Violations can result in fines starting around $25 plus fees.
-
Clear safety labeling: Manufacturers must label bikes with their class (1, 2, or 3), top assisted speed, motor wattage, and a safety compliance mark.
-
Sales and rental bans: Selling, leasing, or distributing non-compliant e-bikes or batteries will be illegal starting in 2026, with rental bans following in 2028.
-
Rules for minors: Parents or guardians can be cited for certain e-bike violations involving minors, including helmet use. Some fines may be dismissed if a California Highway Patrol safety course is completed.
-
Throttle restrictions:
-
Class 1 and Class 3 e-bikes may not have throttles, except for a low-speed “walk-assist” feature capped at 3.7 mph.
-
Class 2 e-bikes may have throttles, but they must cut out at 20 mph.
-
These measures are meant to improve visibility, reduce crashes, and address risks such as battery fires — all real and growing concerns as e-bike use explodes across cities and suburbs.
The Speed Gap the Law Doesn’t Close
The law’s core weakness, critics say, lies in what happens after purchase.
Many e-bikes sold as compliant Class 2 or Class 3 models can be easily altered to go far faster than the legal limits of 20 or 28 mph. Riders can unlock higher speeds through hidden settings in onboard displays, inexpensive controller swaps, software “hacks,” or aftermarket throttles sold online and in some local shops.
In practice, this means a bike legally labeled and sold as a 20-mph Class 2 can end up traveling at 30, 40, or even 50 mph — often without upgraded brakes, frames, or tires designed for those speeds.
That gap matters because speed, not visibility, is increasingly at the center of serious e-bike crashes, especially those involving teens and young riders. At higher speeds, reaction time shrinks, stopping distances grow, and collisions become far more severe — blurring the line between a bicycle and a motor vehicle.
Aftermarket Throttles and “DIY Upgrades”
SB 1271 restricts throttles by class, but enforcement remains a challenge. Aftermarket throttles can be added after purchase, converting a pedal-assist bike into something closer to an electric scooter or lightweight motorcycle — without registration, insurance, or licensing.
The law bans the sale of non-compliant bikes, but it does not directly regulate the aftermarket ecosystem that makes these upgrades widely accessible. As a result, compliance at the point of sale may not reflect how the bike is actually used on the street weeks or months later.
Will the Law Achieve Its Goal?
California’s intent is clear: make e-bikes safer, more standardized, and easier to regulate as they become a permanent part of transportation infrastructure. SB 1271 is a meaningful step toward that goal, especially for manufacturers and retailers who now face clearer rules and stronger penalties.
But without stronger mechanisms to address speed manipulation — or clearer consequences for turning a legal e-bike into an illegal high-speed vehicle — the law may struggle to tackle the most dangerous behavior it seeks to prevent.
As e-bikes continue to replace cars for short trips and become popular with younger riders, the debate is likely to intensify: At what point does an e-bike stop being a bike — and should the law treat it that way?
For now, California is betting that visibility, labeling, and sales restrictions will improve safety. Whether that’s enough to slow down a market built around speed remains an open question.
